chore: initial commit of vault before dashboard work

wiki/queries/2026-07-14-network-from-standing-start.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# How Does an Individual Build a Network From a Standing Start?
+
+#query
+
+## Question Asked
+
+"How does an individual actually build a network from a standing start?" — the vault-level open question left unresolved by the Sebastian interview (principles offered, mechanics missing), and Eugene's own ~6-month blocker.
+
+## Answer
+
+The corpus cannot answer it yet, so this query produces two artifacts instead of a synthesis:
+
+1. **A tentative protocol** distilled from existing fragments — now at [[network-from-a-standing-start]] (pick recurring venues → sustainable cadence → lead with humanness → engineer second meetings in different circumstances → track second meetings, not contacts → let referrals replace outreach). Marked tentative throughout.
+2. **A follow-up interview instrument for Sebastian** (below) — designed to extract *biographical mechanics* rather than principles, because people give principles when asked abstractly and mechanics when asked about their own past.
+
+### Interview instrument: Sebastian, round 2
+
+**A. The bootstrap (tests whether a standing start ever existed)**
+
+1. Walk me through Virtido's first year. Where did clients #1, #2, #3 actually come from — the specific chain of introductions, person by person?
+2. Before Virtido: what network did you inherit from prior jobs or study? How much of year-one business traces back to it?
+3. If the inherited network was the seed — what would you have done without it?
+
+**B. The mechanics (turns principles into steps)**
+
+4. Month one, week one: what did you literally do? Which events, how did you find them, how did you choose?
+5. First conversations with strangers: what did you lead with? What approaches failed?
+6. The second-meeting mechanic — do you deliberately re-attend venues to re-meet the same people, or does it happen by accident?
+7. Rough funnel numbers for year one: events attended → real conversations → second meetings → clients. How long until the first referral arrived?
+
+**C. The falsification (tests "Big zero" and the protocol)**
+
+8. What did you try that failed *before* concluding online outreach is a "Big zero"? Did LinkedIn/content/email ever produce even one client?
+9. Dropped in a new city today, zero contacts: what exactly would you do in the first 90 days?
+10. Eugene isn't selling a company — he's an employed engineer building individual reputation. What's his equivalent of your business lunches, and what's the minimum viable cadence (your 2–4 days/week is a full sales motion)?
+
+### Complementary route (not yet run)
+
+Outside literature via deep research — weak-ties research (Granovetter), mere-exposure effects behind the second-meeting mechanic, and practitioner from-zero playbooks — scoped to *exclude* content marketing and cold outreach so it tests Sebastian's "Big zero" claim rather than ignoring it. Available on request; its output would ingest as a normal source.
+
+## Evidence Trail
+
+- Principles-without-mechanics gap, "Big zero", second-meeting mechanics — [[2026-07-14-sebastian-eugene-interview]]
+- Eugene's ~6-month blocker and online-tactics disagreement — [[connections-as-moat]], [[eugene]]
+- The live experiment framing (webinar as repeated exposure) — [[2026-07-14-nina-interview]], [[2026-07-14-yulia-interview]]
+
+## Follow-up Questions
+
+- Run the round-2 interview (Eugene's existing record→transcribe pipeline makes it a free new source).
+- Decide whether to run the deep-research complement.
+- Track the webinar → paid-HR-build chain as the protocol's first case study.
+
+## Did This Change Existing Pages?
+
+Yes — created [[network-from-a-standing-start]] (concept); updated [[connections-as-moat]] (open question now has a protocol + validation plan), [[overview]] (vault-level open question annotated), `index.md`, `log.md`.