chore: initial commit of vault before dashboard work

wiki/concepts/seniority-and-the-junior-squeeze.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# Seniority and the Junior Squeeze
+
+#concept
+
+## Summary
+
+Counter-intuitively, AI has *raised* demand for seniors and made juniors "completely irrelevant" in the market — even though a junior + Claude could, in theory, produce the same output. The differentiator is **judgment as risk reduction**.
+
+## Current Understanding
+
+- **Why seniors win:** 20 years of experience = knowing *where things typically go wrong*, so you don't let the AI make those mistakes. "AI does the same mistakes humans do because it's trained on our mistakes." The senior's real product is judgment — see [[product-ownership]].
+- **The junior risk (a security argument):** the habit of clicking "yes… yes… allow for all future" is how "API keys are leaked, databases get dumped or deleted." A junior can't evaluate a 250-line bash script; a senior at least *could*. "Give a junior fresh out of university access to this almighty Claude and… the codebase — they will [wreck] it in two days." **Read what you approve.**
+- **Team shape:** the ~8-person scrum team (scrum master + PM + requirements engineer + big dev team) collapses to **2–3 people** — one coordination/ownership role plus one or two who manage the coding agents, sharing responsibilities.
+- **Leveling caveat:** on *pure programming skill*, AI **levels** senior and junior (same output). The senior's edge is entirely in judgment, verification, and knowing failure modes — not typing speed. Contrast with [[connections-as-moat]], where the edge is relationships.
+
+## Evidence
+
+- Seniors more valuable, juniors squeezed, "allow-all" security habit, junior-wrecks-it-in-2-days, team collapse to 2–3 — [[2026-07-14-sebastian-eugene-interview]].
+
+## Related Pages
+
+- Concepts: [[product-ownership]], [[enterprise-ai-reality]], [[connections-as-moat]], [[code-as-throwaway]]
+- Entities: [[sebastian]], [[eugene]]
+
+## Contradictions / Uncertainty
+
+- Tension: if a junior + Claude can match a senior's output, "juniors are irrelevant" may reflect *today's* hiring psychology more than a permanent truth — and it raises an unspoken pipeline problem (where do future seniors come from?). Status: tentative.
+
+## Next Questions
+
+- If juniors can't get in, how does the industry produce the next generation of seniors?