admin/WebinarNotes
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: correct the absent-concept grouping claim

Browse Source 
index.md groups integration-dead-ends and leave-less-room-for-imagination
under Machine side, and both are absent from the script. The claim that every
absent concept is human-side or strategy-side was wrong: it is 8 of 10.
This commit is contained in:
meels
2026-07-28 14:03:07 +02:00
parent 2522c70463
commit a5ca1b0ee4
2 changed files with 9 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-28-webinar-dashboard-design.md
View File

@@ -233,8 +233,11 @@ Read manually while designing; the first real sync will regenerate it. 19 concep
think-wider-not-bigger, make-more-cheap-code, enterprise-ai-reality,
integration-dead-ends, leave-less-room-for-imagination
Every absent concept is human-side or strategy-side. The `ReAct` station carries no wiki
concept at all.
Eight of the ten absent concepts are human-side or strategy-side per `index.md`'s grouping.
The other two — `integration-dead-ends` and `leave-less-room-for-imagination` — are
machine-side, and are absent because the script demonstrates the happy path and so never
reaches connector gating or spec ambiguity, the two ways the machine side fails in
practice. The `ReAct` station carries no wiki concept at all.
## Out of scope for v1