feat: add script coverage file and Workflow D sync contract
This commit is contained in:
8
log.md
8
log.md
@@ -147,3 +147,11 @@ Entry format:
|
||||
- Pages updated: [[make-more-cheap-code]] (next-question marked answered, link added), [[leave-less-room-for-imagination]] (new next-question: drift harnessed as a sandboxed ambiguity diagnostic — synthesis, tentative), `index.md` (Queries section).
|
||||
- Notes: Pure synthesis, no new source — every mapped pattern is grounded in corpus use cases (Nina/Yulia job descriptions, candidate KB, sourcing; Larysa spec ambiguity; Allie's anti-AI-language checker-skill precedent). Key reframes with durable value: (1) the fresh-agent misread test inverts [[leave-less-room-for-imagination]] — drift becomes a diagnostic when sandboxed; (2) [[solve-first-then-skillify]] populates skills in two species, producers and checkers. Flagged honestly: the whole mapping is argument-by-analogy with no measured claim; Nina's transcript-beats-summary finding is a standing counterweight to summary-based review.
|
||||
- Next: decide whether "checker skills" earns a slide on the webinar's skills rung; the webinar-deliverable docs (`Ideas`, `Plan`, `script`, `my theses.md`) remain un-ingested; first lint pass still overdue (9 sources, 18 concepts, 2026-07-24 now has 1 query, 0 lint reports).
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-07-28 — sync (script coverage, initial)
|
||||
- Intent: sync script coverage
|
||||
- Input: first run of Workflow D, establishing `wiki/script-coverage.md`.
|
||||
- Pages created: [[script-coverage]] (coverage) — 19 rows, one per concept page.
|
||||
- Pages updated: `CLAUDE.md` (folder convention, `#coverage` tag row, Workflow D, new intent), `index.md` (new Coverage section; corrected the not-yet-ingested list — `Ideas for webinar.md` and `my theses.md` were listed under `raw/sources/` but live in `raw/notes/`, and `Agentic Engineering, explained by a 10x developer.md` was missing entirely).
|
||||
- Notes: Initial assessment is 5 covered, 4 partial, 10 absent. Every absent concept is human-side or strategy-side — the script is entirely machine-side. The `ReAct` station carries no wiki concept. No concept pages were edited.
|
||||
- Next: decide whether the human-side cluster earns a station or is a deliberate cut; pin the rows that are decided so future syncs leave them alone.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user