admin/WebinarNotes
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: correct absent-concept grouping claim in script coverage notes

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
meels
2026-07-28 14:02:30 +02:00
parent c88a5d002c
commit 2522c70463
2 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
wiki/script-coverage.md
View File

@@ -34,7 +34,8 @@
## Notes
- The script is entirely machine-side. Every absent concept is human-side or strategy-side.
- Eight of the ten absent concepts are human-side or strategy-side, per the grouping in `index.md`. The script's spine is machine-side and it never reaches that material.
- The remaining two absent concepts are machine-side: [[integration-dead-ends]] and [[leave-less-room-for-imagination]]. The script demonstrates the happy path, so it never reaches connector gating or spec ambiguity — the two ways the machine side fails in practice.
- The `ReAct` station carries no wiki concept at all.
- Set `Pinned` to `yes` on any row whose status is a deliberate decision. Sync will not touch it.