Specify the coverage file shape and wire Workflow A into Workflow D (I4, I5)

- I4: added a fourth Required Page Template for wiki/script-coverage.md
  spelling out the exact positional shape parseCoverageTable requires
  (metadata line syntax, column order, station spelling, lowercase all/yes) —
  Workflow D described the fields but never the shape, so a compliant write
  could still fail every parse. Also spelled out the seven station names in
  Workflow D step 3 and resolved the step 4 (pinned rows are protected) vs
  step 5 (stale rows are removed) ambiguity for a pinned row whose concept
  page is gone.
- I5: added Workflow A step 9, pointing any ingest that touches
  wiki/concepts/ at Workflow D before reporting — previously that trigger
  lived only inside Workflow D's own list, so an ingest run top to bottom
  never synced coverage and the right pane went stale silently.
- log.md: added "sync" to the intent docstring's valid values (Workflow D
  already required it) and corrected the 2026-07-28 entry's attribution —
  the concept grouping lives in index.md, not in script-coverage.md itself.

CLAUDE.md

@@ -122,6 +122,29 @@ Must include:
 - Follow-up questions
 - Whether this output changed existing pages
 
+### 4) Coverage File (`wiki/script-coverage.md`)
+
+Machine-read by the dashboard plugin, which parses the table positionally. The
+shape below is required exactly — a deviation renders as parse errors, not as a
+best-effort read.
+
+- `# Script coverage`
+- `#coverage` tag line
+- `## Metadata`, containing these two lines verbatim in this form:
+  - `- **Script:** ` followed by the raw script path in backticks
+  - `- **Last synced:** ` followed by a `YYYY-MM-DD` date
+- `## Coverage`, containing one markdown table with exactly these four columns in
+  this order: `Concept`, `Status`, `Station`, `Pinned`
+  - **Concept** — an Obsidian wikilink to a page in `wiki/concepts/`
+  - **Status** — exactly one of `covered`, `partial`, `absent`, lowercase
+  - **Station** — one of the seven station names spelled exactly as listed in
+    Workflow D, a comma-separated list of them, the lowercase word `all`, or an
+    em dash `—` when the status is `absent`
+  - **Pinned** — the lowercase word `yes`, or empty
+- `## Notes` and `## Related Pages` are free prose and are not parsed.
+
+The parser reads every markdown table in the file, so do not add a second table.
+
 ## Standard Workflows
 
 ### Workflow A: Ingest One Source
@@ -136,6 +159,8 @@ When user says "ingest <source>":
 6. Update `index.md`.
 7. Append ingest entry to `log.md`.
 8. Report what changed, what is uncertain, and suggested next source/questions.
+9. If this ingest created or modified any page in `wiki/concepts/`, run Workflow D
+   (Sync Script Coverage) before reporting.
 
 ### Workflow B: Answer Query
 
@@ -169,10 +194,14 @@ against the script named in that file's `**Script:**` metadata field.
    - `covered` — the script delivers the idea, whether or not it uses the page's name.
    - `partial` — the script gestures at it but never lands it.
    - `absent` — the script never reaches it.
-   - `Station` is one of the seven, a comma-separated list, `all`, or `—` when absent.
+   - `Station` is one of the seven — `Chat box`, `ReAct`, `Tools`, `Memory`,
+     `Skills`, `Process`, `OS` — spelled exactly as written here, or a
+     comma-separated list of them, or the lowercase word `all`, or `—` when absent.
 4. **Never modify a row whose `Pinned` is `yes`** — not its status, not its station.
    A pinned row is the user's judgment and outranks yours.
 5. Add rows for concept pages with no row. Remove rows whose concept page no longer exists.
+   A pinned row whose concept page no longer exists is still removed — step 4
+   protects the user's judgement about a live concept, not a dangling row.
 6. Update `**Last synced:**` to today.
 7. Update `index.md` and append a `sync` entry to `log.md`.
 

log.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Entry format:
 
 ```
 ## YYYY-MM-DD — <operation>
-- Intent: ingest | query | lint | maintenance
+- Intent: ingest | query | lint | maintenance | sync
 - Input: <source path / question / scope>
 - Pages changed: [[...]], [[...]]
 - Notes: <what changed, uncertainty, next steps>
@@ -153,5 +153,5 @@ Entry format:
 - Input: first run of Workflow D, establishing `wiki/script-coverage.md`.
 - Pages created: [[script-coverage]] (coverage) — 19 rows, one per concept page.
 - Pages updated: `CLAUDE.md` (folder convention, `#coverage` tag row, Workflow D, new intent), `index.md` (new Coverage section; corrected the not-yet-ingested list — `Ideas for webinar.md` and `my theses.md` were listed under `raw/sources/` but live in `raw/notes/`, and `Agentic Engineering, explained by a 10x developer.md` was missing entirely).
-- Notes: Initial assessment is 5 covered, 4 partial, 10 absent. Eight of the ten absent are human-side or strategy-side per this file's own concept grouping; the other two — [[integration-dead-ends]] and [[leave-less-room-for-imagination]] — are machine-side, absent because the script demos the happy path and never reaches connector gating or spec ambiguity. The `ReAct` station carries no wiki concept. No concept pages were edited.
+- Notes: Initial assessment is 5 covered, 4 partial, 10 absent. Eight of the ten absent are human-side or strategy-side per the grouping in index.md; the other two — [[integration-dead-ends]] and [[leave-less-room-for-imagination]] — are machine-side, absent because the script demos the happy path and never reaches connector gating or spec ambiguity. The `ReAct` station carries no wiki concept. No concept pages were edited.
 - Next: decide whether the human-side cluster earns a station or is a deliberate cut; decide separately whether the two absent machine-side failure modes belong in the demo; pin the rows that are decided so future syncs leave them alone.