# Design The Perfect Offer in Under 10 Minutes

#source #offer-design #pricing

## Source Metadata

- **Date:** unknown (video publication date not recorded in raw file)
- **Raw path:** `raw/sources/Design The Perfect Offer in Under 10 Minutes.md`
- **Source type:** YouTube video conclusions/notes (09:35 runtime) — <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19QYlpGvcLo>
- **Ingestion date:** 2026-07-17
- **Format note:** The raw file is a distilled conclusions document, not a verbatim transcript. Claims are therefore already one interpretive layer removed from the speaker.

## Core Claims

1. **Productize or stay poor.** Selling "I do X for you" forces every engagement into custom hourly work. ~90% of service businesses operate this way and net **less than minimum wage** per real hour worked.
2. **Backwards math sets the offer, not inspiration.** Pick a revenue target → divide by a ≥$1,000/mo price → that is your client count. $10,000 ÷ $1,000 = 10 clients.
3. **$1,000/mo is the floor.** Below ~$100/mo there is no margin to fund delivery quality — pricing itself constrains how good the service can be. $1K is defensible for AI/business services because one new client is typically worth ~$1K to the buyer, so a single win recoups the fee.
4. **Hungry crowd beats best burger.** Don't invent a novel service; listen to what the market already asks for and name its bottleneck back to it as an offer.
5. **Anchor the ladder on the core tier, then bracket it.** Design the middle offer first, then build entry (~40–50% of core) and top (~5× core) around it.
6. **People don't buy your time. They buy your standards.** Buyers want the methodology and the standard, not your presence.
7. **The market is fatigued by sales calls.** Ship both a pitch deck and a text offer doc; default to selling in chat and escalate to a call only when the buyer asks.

## Key Evidence / Details

**The ladder built live on-camera:**

| Tier | Price | What it is | Client gets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $444 (AI Jumpstart) | 90-min working session | One workflow built with them |
| **Core** | **$997/mo** | The productized monthly | 1 personalized AI agent + dashboard + 1 new workflow/month |
| Top | $5,000/mo (AI Ecosystem) | Full deployment | Rolled out business-wide + team training + monthly call |

**The reframe that carries the whole method:**

| Weak (service framing) | Strong (productized outcome) |
|---|---|
| "I'll audit your calendar and set up some automations" | "I guarantee I'll buy back 10 hours of your time per week using AI, for $1,000/mo — every month." |

10 hrs/week × 4 = **40 hours/month** returned, recurring. Concrete, defensible, priceable.

**Language rules:**

- Never "3 hours per month **with me**" → say "with my team" (or "me or my team"). If you promise yourself and don't show, they're upset; promise the team and show up anyway, that's a bonus.
- Never "I do AI for you" → say "this is my specific methodology for [outcome]".

**On AI as co-designer:** the AI-generated recommendation (workflow + dashboard + agent) matched the coach's own best-practice structure. Claimed leverage: the deck-and-doc drudgery that used to require a paid coach is now free; what remains scarce is knowing which questions to feed it.

**Audience:** solo operators and small agencies stuck in custom-hourly work (AI, marketing, coaching, consulting) wanting a recurring $1K–$5K/mo productized model without inventing a new category.

## Connections

- [[productized-service]] — this source is the primary evidence for the productization mechanic
- [[offer-ladder]] — the three-tier structure and middle-out design rule originate here
- [[outcome-based-selling]] — "buy back 10 hours/week" as the canonical outcome framing
- [[pricing-from-value]] — the $1K floor and backwards-math model
- [[niche-selection]] — hungry crowd over best burger
- [[pain-discovery]] — "what's your biggest bottleneck around [domain]?"
- [[methodology-as-moat]] — "people buy your standards"
- [[ai-market-shift]] — AI as free offer-design labor
- Cross-source: [[2026-06-15-selling-development-services-in-the-ai-era]] agrees on productization and outcome-selling, disagrees on sales-call posture

## Open Questions

- Who is the speaker/coach, and who is the guest whose ladder was built? The raw file names neither. **Update 2026-07-23: plausibly [[dan-martell]].** Evidence from [[2026-07-23-make-my-first-100k-in-month]] (named-Martell): this page's signature offer is *"buy back 10 hours of your time per week"* — *Buy Back Your Time* is Martell's book and flagship frame; the $997/mo core matches his $1K/mo sweet spot; the chat-first close matches his claimed 8-figures-by-chat channel; and the three-tier ~$1K-core ladder recurs there with a decoy rationale. Weaker than the 07-18 case (no verbatim mechanism reuse) — held as suspicion, not attribution. Owner confirmation would settle whether this "anchor" source is independent of the Martell corpus at all.
- Is the "<minimum wage for 90% of service businesses" figure sourced, or rhetorical? No citation given.
- Is "$1K is what one new client is worth" specific to lead-gen-adjacent buyers? It plausibly fails for buyers whose customer LTV is far below or above $1K.
- The $444 / $997 / $5,000 ladder is one worked example on one call. Is the 40–50% / 5× bracketing a real rule or a post-hoc description of this single case?
- "You can literally make a million dollars a month over chat" — unsupported, treat as motivational framing rather than evidence.

## Change Impact on Wiki

First ingest into an empty vault (alongside [[2026-06-15-selling-development-services-in-the-ai-era]]).

- Created [[productized-service]], [[offer-ladder]], [[outcome-based-selling]], [[pricing-from-value]], [[niche-selection]], [[pain-discovery]], [[methodology-as-moat]], [[ai-market-shift]] — this source is a primary evidence stream for all eight.
- [[offer-ladder]] is sourced almost entirely from this page; it has no corroboration and is marked `Status: tentative`.
- Contributed the chat-first selling position that stands in tension with the founder-led outbound position in the other source; recorded under Contradictions in [[sales-discipline]] and [[overview]].
