# 17 Ways to Get Your 1st Client as a Developer in 2026 (AB Analytics)

#source #sales #outbound #marketing

## Source Metadata

- **Date:** batched 2026-06-15; underlying video undated. Duration 40:49.
- **Raw path:** `raw/sources/17 ways to get your 1st client as a developer in 2026.md`
- **Source type:** YouTube video conclusions — <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mugDs0XaQ1A>
- **Speaker:** founder of [[ab-analytics]] (B2B AI consulting, LA) and the *Code to CEO* accelerator.
- **Ingestion date:** 2026-07-17
- **Provenance role:** Primary source for the "AB Analytics" citations in [[2026-06-15-selling-development-services-in-the-ai-era]] — the origin of the follow-up statistics, the 3-channels×90-days rule, the DIY→DWY→DFY ladder, and the webinar formula.

## Core Claims

1. **Fish where no one else is fishing.** Most engineers fight for scraps on the same crowded channels (Upwork, generic LinkedIn/X). 17 channels are stacked in three tiers: common, low-key, out-of-the-box.
2. **Pick 3 methods — one per tier — and run them daily for 90 days** before adding more. "Consistency beats intensity every single time. 30 minutes a day beats five hours once a month."
3. **Follow up ≥5 times** — ~80% of sales happen after the 5th contact; most devs quit after one.
4. **Niche specificity beats volume** — "Shopify developer for fashion brands" outsells "web developer" everywhere.

## Key Evidence / Details

**Tier 1 — common (do not stay here):** (1) freelance platforms — ~18% take, race to the bottom, only sensible for a true beginner in a low-cost country; (2) **LinkedIn** — profile = resume+portfolio+sales page; connect with decision-makers and referral partners; never sell in message one; (3) **content marketing** — the contrarian rule: *don't start until you already make $10–15k/mo from outbound*, else you starve; content is a leverage layer, not a first channel; (4) **cold email** — subject line carries **47%** of the open, spend 50% of your time there; body < 100 words: context → observation → value → proof → one CTA; (5) **referrals** — highest-converting, ~0 cost; the gap is **91% would refer, only 11% are asked** — ask right after delivery, be specific, make it frictionless.

**Follow-up cadence:** Day 0 → 3 → 7 → 14 → 30 (break-up email). This is the origin of the "5 touches" and cadence claims elsewhere in the vault.

**Tier 2 — low-key (local/in-person):** Chamber of Commerce (the speaker's most underrated — 4000+ in the US, member directory = pre-qualified list, show up 3× = "regular", 6× = trusted, then invited to speak); local business groups (BNI members average ~$20k/yr in referred business); industry associations; high-end hotels ("sauna + bar" strategy); car shows/expos (rich attendees = business owners); local conferences (begging for speakers → instant credibility); golf courses (2 clients from ~40–50 hrs ≈ 20× ROI); premium gyms + country clubs (5am crowd = execs; he moved Crunch → **Equinox** for the $200+/mo ICP).

**Tier 3 — out-of-the-box:** strategic partnerships (vendors serving your ICP); **productize services** — "the single biggest change to his client acquisition" — DIY → DWY → **DFY** (his focus today); in-person workshops (paid or free, libraries/co-working give space); case-study → **webinar funnel** — formula **60% teach / 20% case study / 20% offer → 15–25% conversion**; one webinar = 3–6 months of work.

**Cross-cutting:** lifestyle-integrate the in-person channels (gym/hotels/car shows you'd attend anyway); track every stage (outreach→response→meeting→proposal→close); "client #1 is hardest, #5 easier, #10 comes to you."

## Connections

- [[client-acquisition-channels]] — this is the primary source for the channel taxonomy
- [[sales-discipline]] — 5 touches, 3×90, consistency>intensity, cadence, webinar formula
- [[relationships-as-moat]] — the Tier-2 in-person channels *partially agree* with Sebastian, while Tier-1 online channels contradict him
- [[productized-service]] — the DIY→DWY→DFY ladder
- [[niche-selection]] — niche specificity beats volume
- [[ab-analytics]] — speaker/org

## Open Questions

- The speaker plugs the *Code to CEO* accelerator throughout; named successes ("Paul," "John," "Dom") are members → treat metrics as **marketing-flavored claims, not independent data** (the raw note flags this explicitly).
- Premium-gym/country-club/hotel tactics assume disposable income and a major US city.
- Direct conflict with [[relationships-as-moat]]: this source rates LinkedIn/cold-email as live channels; Sebastian rates online outreach "Big zero." Unresolved.

## Change Impact on Wiki

- Named primary source behind the follow-up statistics and cadence in [[sales-discipline]] (hedge downgraded from "uncited via distillation" to "attributable YouTube claim, promotional context").
- Created [[client-acquisition-channels]] (channel taxonomy) and entity [[ab-analytics]].
- Supplied the in-person-vs-online tension that anchors [[relationships-as-moat]].
